• Feyd@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Oh great another centralized repository of data about people (uploaded without their knowledge or consent in the case of the men) that definitely won’t be abused by bad actors

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Someone saw that Black Mirror episode and said “Let’s make that for real.”

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Huh…

    Part of these types of things generally seem like a well-intentioned idea, but it’s also so creepy, scammy, and gross. This data won’t stop here by any means, and will be sold or used in a million different even shittier ways. Pretty fucked.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    If I was going to make something like this, it would have to incorporate trust chains. I don’t care if some maga-hat says this lady is horrible. I care if my good friend Alex says she’s horrible. One person’s “this person won’t shut up about communism” is a big red flag (no pun intended) but for someone else that’s the dream.

    When you sign up, you’d need to be referred to someone or be a root node. Anyone connected to you can be weighted differently. If some section of the tree is misbehaving, prune it.

    But that’s a lot of work

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Same thing should be done with product reviews, and social media comments, etc., etc.

      Really if someone makes a robust way to have a trust chain that integrates into the Internet at large, that would prevent a whole universe of problems we have in modern society.

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Friendly reminder that Facebook started as FaceMash, an app for men at Harvard to rate the attractiveness of women.

    Both are bad. At least these women are nominally using it for safety and not just looks rating.

    Finally, I would be really darn cautious of using any app like FaceMash or Tea. Seems like a great way to get sued for defamation. Or to become the target of escalated behavior of one of the bad ones.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    People should bombard them with DSAR requests.

    If you’re in a state that support data subject removal requests, like California, email [email protected] and say this is a formal DSAR request to remove all of your PII.

    They have 45 days to follow through.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Many states in the US have similar regulations. For example, California’s regulations are famously similar to GDPR.

    • brot@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you think about it: The GDPR applies to all data of EU citizens regardless of where they are or where you are. There is no way that this app is not having some EU guy in New York in it and therefore totally in violation of GDPR

      • Semperverus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The treaties and international laws between these countries absolutely allow the EU to enforce GDPR against companies and individuals outside of the EU if it involves an EU citizen as the victim. I know this because I have to work with it every day and I’m from the US.

        • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s the big part of what makes GDPR so wide-reaching and impactful. It protects European residents, not European IP addresses. If you’re a resident of Europe, you’re covered under GDPR. Even if you’re visiting the US. That’s why even Americans get GDPR questions when visiting sites, because the site can’t just filter by IP location to determine whether or not you need to be shown the GDPR prompt.

          Enforcement can be trickier, sure. But to be clear, GDPR does cover non-European companies as long as they’re interacting with a European resident.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    “He’s a cheater,” Walker said, reading some of the comments on one post out loud.

    “What clubs does he go to?” another person asked on a different post. “He’s cute.”

    That illustrates the big problem…

    Some guys are lying assholes and horrible people, but so are some women.

    It’s not going to take long for them to get massively sued, there’s no way they’re vetting the posted info, and it’s literally cyber bullying.

    The guy (yes it’s a guy) who made and owns this is a fucking idiot for not seeing the lawsuits coming.

    • Null User Object@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Some guys are lying assholes and horrible people, but so are some women.

      and some guys anonymously posing as women online to undermine the competition.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Lol, reminds me of a different thread about trump pretending to be a woman and writing into newspapers:

        “Based on the fact that I work for Donald Trump as his secretary—and therefore know him well—I think he treats women with great respect, contrary to what Julie Baumgold implied in her article … I do not believe any man in America gets more calls from women wanting to see him, meet him, or go out with him. The most beautiful women, the most successful women—all women love Donald Trump.”

        Carolin Gallego December 7, 1992. (Not a realperson)

        https://mashable.com/article/donald-trump-carolin-gallego-new-york-magazine-letter

  • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    So I’ve had multiple GF’s who were physically abusive, cheaters, chronic liars, gaslighters… so is there a version of this for me? Or are men never victims still?

    So glad this didn’t exist like ~15 years ago. My one ex, who decided to start a relationship with her co-worker, while we were looking for and then financing a house… When I broke up with her (like 1 week after closing), while I was trying to process the betrayal, she took to Facebook and text messages spamming EVERYONE a fake story about me, trying to pass herself as the victim. Even including a fake pregnancy! All to make me look bad because I caught her cheating. Thankfully, this app didn’t exist, and several of my female friends reached out to me for my side of the story.

    But all the “stories” on that app, 100% vetted, right? We get unbiased, both sides of the story, right… Evidence was required… right? Because imaging the harm someone could do if they were just petty, or scornful, of just bored. It’s not like women have ever made false rape claims… right…

    I’m not trying to imply my situation is what all men go through… but you can’t just dismiss it, or other men, because it doesn’t fit into your social media-fueled narrative. Yes, some men suck (and that’s selling it short). But, women are just as capable of the same level of suck. We are all, after all, human.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I also have been attacked by an ex.

      I can see both sides - if it’s an app about suffering abuse, all should be welcome vs there aren’t enough women-only spaces online and those that exist are frequently brigaded.

      Both have reasonable arguments. Likely a compromise where a filter could be set where you can choose to opt your posts into the women-only feed.

      However, my argument would be this app is bad and no one should be on it. Even if all the content is true, a gossip app that covers legally questionable things is likely not a sensible place to hang around.

    • kieron115@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      People suck, hopefully you were able to take her to court for defamation because what she did is almost the definition of libel where I live (Maryland, US).

    • lenz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      To answer your question, there have been apps like this for men… but they keep getting taken down after users start posting revenge porn.

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      People who pretend to be victims upset me almost as much as people who victimize others (they are not equal, but it is still so fucked up). Victims have a rough enough time already being taken seriously. It doesn’t take more than a few false positives to completely take the air out of legitimate accusations from victims. I wish there was some way to solve this problem.