• KNova@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    yeah, as someone who just played through New Vegas again due to S2 of the show, it would have to be some serious quality of life changes to make me shell out for it again.

    I have never played FO3 though and im putting my hope capital into willing that into existence

      • KNova@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I want to but I don’t own FO3, and at this point i’m waiting to see if a remaster is real. Kinda burnt out on Fallout at this point and need a break anyway.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      it would have to be some serious quality of life changes to make me shell out for it again.

      Eh, I first bought it 20 years ago, and have bought it a couple times since on different platforms.

      If it’s $30 bucks I’m buying it regardless. Maybe not right at first, but eventually I will.

      That’s also why I don’t think any game shouldnt be able to run “maxxed out” on release. A great game people are still gonna want to run it a decade later. It doesn’t hurt anyone if the dial turns to 11 if 10 is the same setting it’s always been.

      So make games that in a decade still look decent on settings no one could enable all at once on release. It doesn’t change the quality on release, just gives it legs to look good longer.