20 hours
You must log in or register to comment.
- mechoman444@lemmy.worldEnglish9 hours
This is getting blown way out of proportion.
What’s being described right now is just an optional date-of-birth field. It doesn’t block installation, it doesn’t require verification, and it doesn’t change how the OS actually works. It just exists, and you can ignore it entirely.
The leap to “this is step one toward needing a passport to install an OS” is a classic slippery slope. It jumps from a harmless, non-enforced field straight to full identity verification with no actual mechanism connecting the two.
More importantly, this ignores how Linux works at a fundamental level.
Linux is open source, which means the code is public and can be modified by anyone. If any distribution ever tried to enforce something invasive like identity checks, that code would be stripped out almost immediately and redistributed as a fork. People already fork distributions over far smaller disagreements than this, and users would migrate just as quickly.
For this scenario people are worried about to actually happen, the entire ecosystem would have to move in lockstep and the community would have to abandon one of its core principles overnight. That’s not a realistic outcome.
Being skeptical of regulation is reasonable. Treating this like the beginning of mandatory identity verification at the OS level, especially in the Linux world, just isn’t grounded in how the technology or the community actually operates.
50 minutesWhat’s being described right now is just an optional date-of-birth field.
The timing is dogshit.
Like getting handed a grenade pin and told “It’s a fucking pin! It’s harmless, what are you worried about?”
- Bjornir@programming.devEnglish4 hours
What is the use case for that field? I do not see it as being used as anything else than a stepping stone towards age verification.
- nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish2 hours
this is the correct way to frame this issue. it serves no purpose other than to support things that are further down a slope
I wonder if a fork becomes successful, or if traditional init based systems make a comeback
enterprise users obviously won’t give a shit about any of this, and will keep using redhat or amazon linux or whatever
Seems like you don’t really need to fork the system until someone applies DOB field in a meaningful way.
Even in such a situation, I would suspect the short-term solution is simply a patch or crack to neuter the functionality that the DOB field is supposed to implement. A full fork seems unnecessary, even counterproductive, since it would define your OS as meaningfully distinct (and noticeably out of compliance) with a standard installation.
- lightnsfw@reddthat.comEnglish5 hours
It’s giving an inch. We shouldn’t be doing that. We should be fighting tooth an nail against every single aggression against our privacy. They’ve already taken far too much.
- cley_faye@lemmy.worldEnglish4 hours
is a classic slippery slope
Were have you been the last few years or so? We’re not just “going down” one slippery slope after another, we’re speeding down them.
with mass adoption of enshitification. and with the world in general. calling things a slippery slope fallacy is a long and losing gamble.
if the field was put in because of a law, then it’s for a reason, if the data isn’t important, or enforced, then it is useless and should not have been added.
- mechoman444@lemmy.worldEnglish5 hours
Commentary like this is exactly what grinds my gears.
This isn’t analysis, it’s implication, conjecture, and conspiracy framed as insight.
The age verification laws are objectively bad. They do nothing meaningful to protect children, degrade the quality of the internet, and hand more authority to a government that already has too much.
But your line of argument is also flawed. I’ve already stated my position clearly. Repeating “it’s probably worse” adds nothing of substance.
More importantly, the fundamental architecture of Linux makes this entire premise irrelevant. It is open source and inherently resistant to centralized control. Governments can pass whatever laws they want; they cannot meaningfully enforce them at the system level in an ecosystem designed to be forked, modified, and redistributed at will.
the laws are bad, and you can push fighting for anonymity and freedom down the road because letting the camel stick its nose under the tent don’t bother anyone, and it’s too easy to just ignore…. but the laws are made for a purpose, and they will change. and uh oh, the camel has flipped the tent, you can’t fight to remove it because now systems are built around it being there. now it’s a much harder fight because we didn’t fight when it was easy.
again after seeing everything that has happened you call sounding the alarm for this as a slippery slope… i am sorry, but i question either your motives, or your foresight.
- 5 hours
I wonder if it was put in for the same reason CA passed a self-reporting law recently. I wonder if it’s an attempt to repel through malicious compliance far worse age verification that’s forced at a federal (US) level.
- brzrd@lemmy.worldEnglish7 hours
If that is the case, explain why is it being implemented in the heat of mass age verification? What is the motive?
- mechoman444@lemmy.worldEnglish7 hours
The motive is mass government surveillance obviously.
But like with many things in our government federally and statewide, these people don’t actually understand how the technology functions. They can make all the laws that they want and Linux will still remain an open source software.
- brzrd@lemmy.worldEnglish6 hours
Thanks for the explanation. What you have described is not different to the manner in which I understand the situation as well.
My concern is that (despite your good intentions) your previous comment may have the unintended effect of making light of the situation we are all in.
The ‘field’ we have the privilege to ignore now id a mandatory requirement for a passport and iris scan tomorrow.
My first thought is to not sit still and accept the new law - rather, to empower everybody here to write to their legislators to block or reverse these gross violations of privacy. May Linux developers have already expressed willful non-compliance to the law. Show we not get behind these developers and organisations (like the EFF) and demand a repeal?
I however apologise if I have misunderstood your intent. But one thing is for sure, if we do not put up a fight at present, then the future is already lost.
- mechoman444@lemmy.worldEnglish5 hours
Dawg. That’s what I’m saying. There’s nothing to fight against. The fundamental architecture of Linux prohibits age verification completely.
The devs adding in the birthday field was the simplest way to placate this new law. They know there’s going to be a fork where it is removed.
In this instance the new law will destroy itself. I doubt there will even be any enforcement of it.
We’re worrying about the wrong thing dude. This is a non-issue.
- brzrd@lemmy.worldEnglish3 hours
“The fundamental architecture of Linux prohibits age verification completely”…until the next law erodes that privilege altogether.
I hope you are right. And for all our sakes, I really hope I am wrong.
- ramble81@lemmy.zipEnglish8 hours
My hate of SystemD is further justified! And you all just called me gray haired and not willing to update with the times!
- eleitl@lemmy.zipEnglish5 hours
Remember when they said “relax, it’s just an init system, no biggie”? Pepperidge farm remembers.
An init system does not need to know my personal details; it’s for starting programs in a specific order just fuck off with this shit. You don’t even have to capitulate to this stuff and these freaks are out here doing it preemptively like they expect a fucking pat on the head for being first in line to dive tongue first on to that boot.
- 16 hours
Systemd isn’t an init system. Systemd-init is an init system and it is a part of the systemd suite.
- eleitl@lemmy.zipEnglish5 hours
It has been sold as just an init system to people who argued it’s a Katamari Damacy. We now know who was right.
Whatever the fuck it is it doesn’t need to know how old I am to do its job.
- mcv@lemmy.zipEnglish15 hours
It already has fields for personal information, though, and they’re every bit as sensitive as your birthdate. realName, emailAddress, location, and timezone are already in there. The important part is that they’re all optional, and you don’t have to fill them in at all, or can fill them in with fake data. The system still serves you, not some outside party.
But the timing of it does have a lot of people freaking out about it.
I now fear it will one day be required for services on the internet (as it is by a recent law in California). I want to make that less likely, and more difficult to implement.
Having a principle the majority do not have and refusing to participate means being another step further out of society.
- GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.worldEnglish11 hours
“I’ve already raped your mouth. Rapping your ass is not gonna be any worse, just accept it”
- 15 hours
It doesn’t need to know your age. It just provides a way to take a note of your birth date, only if you want to. The system already has a place to write your name and home address. All are optional and practically nobody uses them.
- GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.worldEnglish11 hours
I find it suspicious how it’s mostly new, few days old users defending this shit. Fuck off bot, go suck your master’s fascist cock.
- Yttra@lemmy.worldEnglish2 hours
And then one can simply remove the requirement for it to be filled, because it’s open source software.
It doesn’t know how old are you, it just remembers a date you tell it. You can give your birthday, but you can choose any other day
- GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.worldEnglish11 hours
This is step 1.
Final step: Scan your passport to verify and populate the date of birth field.
tell me you have only a passing understanding of how modern linux is architected without telling me you have only a passing understanding of how modern linux is architected
- pastermil@sh.itjust.worksEnglish12 hours
Enlighten us then. Why would an operating system management tool need to know the age of its user?
because whilst systemd-initd is the part that everyone is generally aware of, that’s linked to systemd-logind so that processes can be started as different users… process init, session management, and user management are intertwined
they don’t have to be for sure - sysv init proves that - but in modern linux, they are and that comes with a load of benefits
https://deepwiki.com/systemd/systemd/6-user-and-session-management
- pastermil@sh.itjust.worksEnglish7 hours
I get that systemd also manages user data. I still fail to see how it needs that DoB.
because theyre being pragmatic… laws are starting to be introduced around the globe for parental controls - whatever that means in each jurisdiction. given that, there needs to be options available to people wanting to, or required to comply with said laws… the best place to do that is in a user record, as an optional field… extensible user records, in modern linux, are stored in systemd
it needs it in a similar manner to how it needs location, email, real name, etc: it doesn’t functionally need it, but it’s a place to store the metadata associated with a user such that other applications can use it
Honestly idk why people are so mad at the wrong people. They are doing this for concern of following the laws that are being passed in many jurisdictions. Some of which required “operating systems” to store date of birth that apps can access. What that means and what even is an OS is heavily up to debate.
Either way people need to call their lawmakers and be mad at those passing these laws.
- pastermil@sh.itjust.worksEnglish8 hours
It doesn’t. It just needs some name to display on the welcome screen and doesn’t know what else to call it.
Welcome screen? Systemd doesn’t have a welcome screen. And even if it did, why would it need anything other than username?
Why does it need a field for location and email?
- 6 hours
Because back in the 60s and 70s, people wanted to know whose print jobs were running and where the printed documents should be delivered.
So over 40 years before systemd was initially released?
I’m hearing a whole lot of mental gymnastics from both of y’all to explain away the “okay” fields while demonizing the (optional) “evil” fields.
- 10 hours
Because it’s going to be a legal requirement, with fines of $7000 per affected underage user, which will instantly bankrupt the US-based non-profit representing Debian, Arch and others, and kill off community-maintained Linux.
Do note: The legal requirement is NOT for age verification. Only for having a field where you as the admin can enter whatever the fuck you want.If you don’t agree with the law, good. Neither do I. But the devs aren’t the ones to apply pressure to, here.
They’re forced to do this to keep the lights on, and they’ve implemented it in a way that keeps you as the admin in full control.- RibbidRabbid@sopuli.xyzEnglish10 hours
-
Literally no one forced them to do that yet. They just decided to get on their knees preemptively and start licking boots
-
Open source software has maintainers all around the world. Why the fuck would the rest of the world care about this fucked up law coming from ONE state?
Again, no one is forced to do anything. And if I was a maintainer on FOSS where I would be forced to implement something like this, I would just stop contributing to that project.
Fuck everyone going along with this state surveillance bullshit.
- 9 hours
-
It takes a long while for a PR to make it into the distros. The law goes into effect in less than a year.
-
The organization distributing donations to the various distros (Software In The Public Interest) sits in the US and needs to follow US law in order to not be shut down.
Without them, Debian, Arch, LibreOffice, Systemd and dozens of others have no more funding.
-
-
- Silver Needle@lemmy.caEnglish10 hours
Why doesn’t Debian do it instead of systemd? Let the distros decide on the plan of action, this is clearly not something that systemd has to decide. The people maintaining systemd are leveraging the fact that their shite software runs on more than 95% of Linux machines. That is an abuse of power. What is weird too is compliance ahead of time. Compliance ahead of time makes sense with cars, but software can be updated immediately when necessary.
- 9 hours
Debian takes the source code from upstream systemd and creates their own deb package. They’re free to leave out the date field.
- 10 hours
In other news there has been a massive uptick in Boomers converting to Linux…
- 19 hours
Me too!
Although someone (steam maybe? I don’t remember) updated their system and won’t take it anymore. So now it’s 1930-01-01.
You should try it. It’s like I’m 30 years younger!
- Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldEnglish19 hours
Born just in time to not be able to be a nazi!
Yes, I know the Hitler Youth existed…but I don’t hold that against those (at the time) children. They were being conditioned to support a system they didn’t understand.
I figure anyone younger than 20 is too young to be blamed for all that crap. The brain stops developing at age 23. So I don’t expect an 8 year old to hold a very good grasp on international politics and wars. Especially in an age where an hour nightly AM radio broadcast, and a daily morning newspaper were your only source for news.
- 9 hours
The brain stops developing at age 23.
No it doesn’t. The brain continues to develop and change throughout the lifetime of the organism.
- yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zipEnglish14 hours
happily updates its birthdate to 2018-01-01 you can’t blame me now. Take that, woke people.
- raman_klogius@ani.socialEnglish18 hours
The tech nerds should be setting theirs to 1970-01-01 at 00:00 UTC.
- cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish18 hours
That’s the Unix Epoch. The time and date in Linux and Unix is the number of seconds since then.
That’s the default time when the CMOS battery is dead and the RTC is reset.
The contents of the field will be protected from modification except by users with root privileges.
sudo my age to a thousand years then; no, thank you very very much
- 0x0@infosec.pubEnglish9 hours
Ex microslop employee and self appointed systemd emperor Lennart poettering decided to roll that back and proceed
- Treczoks@lemmy.worldEnglish15 hours
It is just a field. What it contains, if anything at all, is irrelevant.
- GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.worldEnglish11 hours
This is step 1.
Final step: Scan your passport to verify and populate the date of birth field.
I remember when this happened for the real name, email and phone number fields.
- cley_faye@lemmy.worldEnglish4 hours
I’m sure you think you’re smart dropping a short, “insightful” three word post. But you might have missed the constant falling down we’ve been having in every possible places these last few years. It’s not a fallacy when it turns out to be a series of fulfilled plans.
Discord. Microsoft.
It’s not a fallacy if it’s an actual slippery slope.
Every step towards making people feel at ease giving personal information away, makes the next one easier.
- rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish19 hours
Systemd isn’t a distro, it’s an init and bootstrapper that underlies several distros
they easily might have meant that the distro they will be using has declared they will not implement this
That was very, very likely what the parent comment meant. The correction was unnecessary.
- Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.worldEnglish19 hours
If the hyperventilators could read that would be a very good point.
- Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.worldEnglish6 hours
. Fort Lauderdale
You know this is a California law we are talking about right?
I guess when everything is a 7th dimensional alien invasion to you, little things like geography don’t matter.
- Silver Needle@lemmy.caEnglish5 hours
How do I come back at someone calling me a fed? Fuck, I don’t have any good arguments pro compliance … Guess I’m going to show how stupid and crazy they are by being a pedant Haha, that’ll show 'em
^you probably
- Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.worldEnglish5 hours
How do I come back at someone pointing out i can’t/don’t read and am hyperventilating over laws that don’t exist outside of my mind? Call everyone a fed.
~ Litterally you & Alex Jones
- Silver Needle@lemmy.caEnglish5 hours
laws that don’t exist outside of my mind
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1043 https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/03/ab-1043s-internet-age-gates-hurt-everyone
I don’t know about you but this looks pretty real to me? Are you going to tell me that there is no AB 1043. Maybe you are trapped in a solipsistic world where this sort of encroachment doesn’t exist.
I know what you are going to say next, “Have you yourself ever seen the curvature of the Ear-”, but let me stop you for a sec and tell you that when you think everything is Alex Jones, you should maybe look at yourself and ask the question “Maybe I am Alex Jones?”
- yeehaw@lemmy.caEnglish16 hours
1930-01-01, done. But this shouldn’t be a requirement to begin with either.
- yeehaw@lemmy.caEnglish10 hours
I meant wouldn’t be a requirement for the operating system to have built into it.
