- Asafum@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
EA you’re already known as the worst, you don’t need to prove the point any more…
12 daysBetween them, Ubisoft, and Blizzard/Activision, it’s been a frantic race to the bottom.
- Stupendous@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
EA to my knowledge just has shitty business practices. Ubisoft at a minimum had a culture of sexual harrassers, possibly assaulters. Blizzard certainly had rapists. Ubisoft also with the pioneering always online DRM for single player games getting back to the games portion of their evils
- Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.netEnglish11 days
Bethesda still manages to stay in the “honorable mention” category.
- Tollana1234567@lemmy.todayEnglish11 days
games like diablo4(expansions) is what keeps people coming back to blizzard.
- supernight52@lemmy.worldEnglish11 days
Which is pitiful, because D4 is just a giant MTX interface with some shiny graphics.
- Tollana1234567@lemmy.todayEnglish11 days
UBISOFT is trying vie for that number 1 spot, they went so far as help produce a show on appletv+ to spread good propaganda bout itself.
- Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish12 days
Man, EA just fully doesn’t give a shit about making games anymore, eh?
- CIA_chatbot@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
Years ago there was an rpg based around skittles. Yes skittles. It was a banger, fun as hell. It also flopped because absolutely-fucking no one wants to play an advertisement.
Listen here EA - the world fucking sucks, no one is fucking happy. Can you just focus on making fun fucking things and not take a giant enshitification all over the one things most of us have to keep us from being on top of a water tower with a high powered rifle? Can we have ONE FUCKING THING??!
- Whitebrow@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
Weirdly enough, there’s been A FEW of these types of games that were based either on a specific product or a specific brand, and they were for the most part, weirdly well done for the times they released in and actually sorta fun.
Off the top of my head, Pepsiman for a specific product and the whole lot of Lego games if we’re talking about a whole product line.
I think that whole genre is called advergames
- jtrek@startrek.websiteEnglish12 days
Chex Quest was legitimately good, but mostly because it was just a Doom mod
- Zephorah@discuss.onlineEnglish12 days
I think legos are in their own genre no matter what. That’s like advertising a game franchise.
- vrek@programming.devEnglish11 days
That was one of them… Weren’t there two others but I agree sneak King was the best.
- Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.netEnglish11 days
Sneak King was fun but, sorry not sorry, Pocketbike Racer was the best. No clue what the third one was.
- grue@lemmy.worldEnglish11 days
I am genuinely surprised none of the freaks around here have mentioned the KFC dating sim yet.
- jaycifer@lemmy.worldEnglish11 days
The Dungeons and Dragons idle game has a champion that is composed of Nerds candy pieces. It’s actually a fun character concept because you can switch the nerds around to different colors, each one with a different class that changes how their mechanics work. But it’s just so weird seeing candy you can eat alongside Drizzt Do’urden that I never use them.
- Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.netEnglish11 days
Sometimes I forget that the LEGO games are just really fancy ads.
- Cavemanfreak@programming.devEnglish11 days
The old Kellogg’s game from mid 90’s was really clunky, but it was great fun as a <10 year old not knowing any better!
- tacosanonymous@mander.xyzEnglish11 days
That Xbox BK game, Domino’s Noid game, I think 7up had an othello clone.
The best game that was just an advertisement was Chex Quest. But, I mean, they hired some teenagers who loved Doom to make the game and gave them little to no oversight other than “explain what a healthy breakfast is and include Chex cereal.” So they just made a kick-ass Doom clone that only marginally advertises the cereal.
- 11 days
The packaging for the game really tried to hide it was an advertisement game. Title is Darkened Skye which says nothing about it being a skittles game.
Apparently the singular of skittles is “Skittles” according to that game
Unfortunately, Andrew Wilson needs more money to purchase more kidnapped children from Asia.
- 11 days
Oh no, don’t make me not buy your product even more. I’m already at 0.
- Aneorthisio@lemmy.mlEnglish12 days
I can’t wait to shoot my way around war torn half destroyed cities with pristine advertising signs in the next Battlefield.
I foresee this getting their titles kicked off steam, since their developer TOS pretty much forbids this.
- mysterious_cake@feddit.nlEnglish11 days
Looks like another punishment for buying their games legally. Cracked versions don’t connect to their servers so they wont load ads.
If the game is not good on its own and requires ads to be profitable… Then it’s not worth buying anyway
- darthelmet@lemmy.worldEnglish11 days
Thinking in terms of “need” is wrong for a business. They aren’t there to make a good product and the money is just to cover all the costs. Their goal is profit maximization. If there’s profit they could be extracting, but aren’t, they won’t make the numbers bigger and the shareholders will be sad.
Ads are a gas. They expand to fill all available space. If there’s a place an ad COULD go, then it WILL go there eventually.
- 11 days
Im still baffled by all the money some games make off cosmetics.
Cosmetics in paid loot boxes are a serious issue, but if you can make money to help pay for your game with non paid lootbox cosmetics, all the more power to ya, but i don’t understand it hah.
“I love it! That’s what’s been missing the whole time!” --EA Shareholders
Finally!
If there’s one thing EA’s gaming lacked, it was an opportunity to accidentally click on something that tried to charge my credit card.
- dis_da_mor@anarchist.nexusEnglish12 days
reminder that saudi arabia’s public fund has bought ea. they’re trying to squeeze out all the revenue they can. tumble down the enshittification pyramid
- Airfried@piefed.socialEnglish12 days
That’s true, although very simplified. The slightly less simplified version is that Jared Kushner’s private equidy firm and the Saudis took a huge loan to buy EA then loaded the company with that debt. EA will be forced to sell a huge chunk of their portfolio and layoff thousands of people. If they survive this somehow they will be a shadow of what once was but more likely they’ll simply vanish soon. This shit should be completely illegal but I would lie if I said I’ll miss EA. A few people at the top getting filthy rich by destroying the company seems like a very fitting end for them.
- nogooduser@lemmy.worldEnglish11 days
It should be illegal to buy a company on loan and transfer that debt to the company. You should be required to get your money back via dividends or by building the company up and reselling it.
- Jiral@lemmy.worldEnglish11 days
They won’t be missed, destroyer of game franchises, studios and pioneer in anti-consumer stuff and transforming games into gambling, children welcome.
- ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish11 days
Running through a bombed out kitchen in a ‘call of battle strike’ game, hesitate when I see the oven is full of condoms and the cabinets full of luxury watches.
- 11 days
You now have 300 condoms in your inventory and an intriguing side mission with your fellow soldiers.
- Airfried@piefed.socialEnglish12 days
Kojima or whoever did it before him should’ve patented it so the disease doesn’t spread.
- DrSleepless@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
I remember when EA was the Goat back in the Commodore 64 days. How far they’ve fallen.
Greatest Offering Around Then?
Because “greatest of all time” implies it’s also great now… which is a time.
We can’t know what’s going to be the greatest of all time in the future, only what’s the greatest of all time so far.
A game developer with a consistently high hit rate in their output? Kojima, maybe? FromSoft? We’ve seen a lot of empires fall in recent years.
Really? They’ve been mostly misses from what I can tell. They don’t review very well or sell many copies for most of their games. Recent reporting indicates that Tencent no longer wants to finance them, and their future is shaky.
- bitjunkie@lemmy.worldEnglish11 days
Seriously? I’m only about halfway through the Life is Strange series, but it’s been fantastic so far and Lost Records just came out last year and looks amazing. To each his own, but I hope they are able to crowdfund or some other alternative if Tencent drops them.
Very hot take but maybe Nintendo? I know, I know. They suck in some regards. But some of their games are still innovative.
- Echo5@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
Fun take but considering how they treat their fans I wouldn’t give them that award.
- Tollana1234567@lemmy.todayEnglish11 days
more slop than innovative, its just the numbnuts keep buying the current pokemon slop games is whats keep switch justified in thier sloppy gaming development.
Does our knowledge of a thing preclude it from being? Is reality subjective or objective? If Bill Smithers of 34 Poplar Way in Schenectady, NY (sorry, Bill) said Ms. Pac-Man was the GOAT of video games make it true because he said it before his passing in 2011 after playing a 49 hour raiding session in World of Warcraft?
It does not. “Greatest of all time back in the day” does not imply it’s still the greatest. By your logic the future is also a time. As we don’t know it yet, nothing can ever be the greatest of all time, making the term meaningless.
So the term is meaningless for you? That’s fine.
Again, if something was the greatest of all time, it does not mean it still has to be. Otherwise the term is meaningless as even greater things might come in the future.
Your definition in your own words defines it as meaningless.
If you only take it in the most literal sense, sure. A pointless exercise, don’t you think? Sometimes words have a funny way of meaning more than one thing. For most this concept works and GOAT can be meaningful. No, I’m not talking about the animal. Just to be clear.
GOAT = Greatest of All Time, right?
Why not just say “great?”
Makes “of all time” meaningless if you overuse it.
Allow me to invoke Eddie Izzard… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rYT0YvQ3hs
- nogooduser@lemmy.worldEnglish11 days
It’s only meaningless if you’re pedantic.
It obviously means the greatest of all time so far because at the time you make the statement you cannot judge what hasn’t happened yet.
It gets more complicated when you’re saying it about a company or game in the past but I still think that it has meaning. It could mean that at the time, they were the greatest of all time (up until that point in time) but it could also mean that at this point in time that past version of EA was the greatest of all time (up until now, which is beyond the time that that version of EA existed).
- Tollana1234567@lemmy.todayEnglish11 days
turned around the time they bought westwood and killed off cnc franchise(technically) a decade later.
