From next month it will start enforcing facial age estimation to allow children to chat with strangers only if they are in their broad age group.

Roblox compared its new system to school cohorts such as elementary, middle school and high school. It will be introduced first in Australia, New Zealand and the Netherlands, where children will be blocked from privately chatting with adults they do not know in real life from next month, and in the rest of the world in early January.

Users will be placed into the following groups: under nine, nine to 12, 13 to 15, 16 to 17, 18 to 20, or 21 and over. Children will be able to chat only with others in their age group and similar ones. For example, a child with an estimated age of 12 will be able to chat only with under-16s. Images and video used for the checks would not be stored, Roblox said.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    6 hours ago

    From next month it will start enforcing facial age estimation to allow children to chat with strangers only if they are in their broad age group.

    This is going to backfire spectacularly, what idiots.

    • dil@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      31 minutes ago

      Ais gonna be like you look mature for your age putting ppl higher or lower

    • Carmakazi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Right on its face, is it even legal to collect head shots of minors? I know US privacy laws are a joke but there’s usually some carve outs that protect minors.

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It’s illegal to collect ANY data from children under 13. Facial scans are WAY worse than the anonymized use stats those laws were put in place to block

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Can’t protect them too much, though. Otherwise, how would the pedo-in-chief and his ilk get a fresh crop of sex slaves?

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      No, no. It makes perfect sense from an investment standpoint. Their actual target audience would love to be able to pay for access to that catalog.