This is a rare look at the tech giant's first operating system
    • Codilingus@piefed.socialEnglish
      3 months

      IIRC they contracted some devs for a one time payment to make it, then proceeded to laugh to the bank while strangling the market over the years.

      • Thorry@feddit.orgEnglish
        3 months

        To be fair, there is a whole lot more to selling software than just making it. There’s this myth out there if you just build the right software at the right time, success is guaranteed. But in reality all of the success stories from the past had many competitors, often with better made software. There’s many factors that go into it, luck is a big factor and upfront cash is also a big one (especially nepotism is a common theme).

        • Test_Tickles@lemmy.worldEnglish
          3 months

          Ya, it takes a massive amount of time and effort to make sure you are born into a family where your mother is on the board of the one and only client big enough to set the standard for the rest of the industry.

  • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.worldEnglish
    3 months

    Someone will probably find a massive vulnerability that affects every version of windows, because why not?

    • Gork@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      3 months

      The printout could have said 80085 but they chose to not be cool.

    • vrek@programming.devEnglish
      3 months

      I can 1/2 read asm, know c/c++/c# and a bunch of other languages but how do I even read this?

        • vrek@programming.devEnglish
          3 months

          He was a business God, not so sure of programming God, more like surrounding himself with programming gods.

          But seriously, how do you read this, is it like a representation of how the memory should be at a specific point in time? I’m guessing blank spaces would be undefined then?

          • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
            English
            3 months

            That’s just the cover page, you can see the source files here.

            The print out is “bundle_2”, while the actual compliable source is in “86DOS.A86”, you can see where the code starts and the header ends.

            • vrek@programming.devEnglish
              3 months

              Ah, the bundle_2 link looks at lot more readable and understandable. That said it’s not even 530am yet here so I’ll need a little while to wake up before I can try to understand it.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldEnglish
    3 months

    Wonder if they’ll start releasing later versions so we can see their attempts to kill Lotus.

    • frongt@lemmy.zipEnglish
      3 months

      I’m sure the Microsoft lawyers went over it thoroughly first. They are very concerned with licenses for things that are to be open-sourced.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      3 months

      Why would CP/M have a dog in the fight? They were a competitor and, if I understand my history right, the wrong horse.

      And By the PC-DOS guys, you mean IBM?

  • blinfabian@feddit.nlEnglish
    3 months

    please opensource windows 11 next. i bet when OpenWindows 11 comes out it will be wayyy better

    • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3 months

      We’re already at the point where Windows programs sometimes run better on Linux with a compatibility layer (WINE/Proton) than they do natively. The stuff that doesn’t run is mostly games ladened with kernel-level DRM that Linux (rightfully) can’t emulate.

      Linux even runs old Windows programs better than Windows itself, and long-term compatibility is supposed to be one of Windows’ biggest selling points.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      3 months

      We’re already on 16, we just spell the Windows part differently. We spell it “suse leap”