• Bongles@lemmy.zipEnglish
    4 hours

    I know it’d be expensive, but I wonder if it’d be worth it to valve to start producing ram. They’ve certainly got the money to get it started, they are getting heavy into hardware that they can use it in, and they could sell it as well.

    I don’t know if there’s a shortage of raw material or if no one wanted to invest in more manufacturing when AI could crash within a short time.

    • Canaconda@lemmy.caEnglish
      34 minutes

      In a nutshell this is impossible because of how the global supply chain works. Specifically how most of the hardware engineers/factories are in Taiwan, and how the technology to make chips is proprietarily owned by a company in Norway.

      Like the whole reason China wants Tiawan in the first place is the same reason they can’t just bomb them into submission… Their population of highly skilled hardware engineers that fundamentally make the global chips supply chain possible is impossible to replace.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2 hours

      I wonder if it’d be worth it to valve to start producing ram.

      They’d need to source the components outside of the increasingly monopolistic US-alligned group of hardware manufacturers. The only way you end run the Big Three is to go to… CHINA. And we’ve layered so many sanctions, tariffs, and putative measures on import of Chinese hardware that it would be a fool’s errand to bother.

      I don’t know if there’s a shortage of raw material or if no one wanted to invest in more manufacturing when AI could crash within a short time.

      Even if there’s an AI crash, the long-term outlook for chip demand only goes up. The problem isn’t with the economic demand, it’s with the provisioning of capital. For the most part, you need to spend tens - if not hundreds - of billions of dollars to start producing even the middle tier of nano-computing components in modern use.

      I might suggest there’s another way to tackle this problem. And it’s one that Valve already is heavily invested in.

      Lower resolution games. Lower hardware requirements. More efficient software engines. More games focused on the mechanics and story than the raw, realistic visuals.

      You can run Doom on a pregnancy test and people still buy that game. Games like “Undertale” and “Vampire Survivors” do incredibly well in part because they are so accessible to anyone with a 15-year-old rig. Rather than trying to build a PS5-killer machine, you can go the Nintendo route and build a novel interface that runs on more basic components. Then you exploit the hell out of your Disney-esque IP without worrying that Halo: Remastered Delux Ultra looks better than the next iteration of Metroid Prime.

    • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      4 hours

      Manufacturing their own sticks would onlympush the problem to the price of RAM chips.

      The resources it takes to start manufacturing modern RAM chips is such that THE ENTIRE FUCKING NATION OF CHINA is finally getting around to it.

      I know Valve is a big company, but that’s a pretty bite to chew and swallow.

      • Ceruleum@lemmy.wtfEnglish
        1 hour

        Even Tsmc tried to make memory and failed. It’s difficult.

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.worldEnglish
          39 minutes

          Now is the time to do it for anyone that can. So much market share available to whoever gets there first.

    • ID10T@programming.devEnglish
      4 hours

      I don’t know if there’s a shortage of raw material or if no one wanted to invest in more manufacturing when AI could crash within a short time.

      My understanding is that it’s the latter. AFAIK it takes something like 3-5 years to get a fab going if you already know what you’re doing, so it would not only be wildly expensive but you’re also gambling that RAM won’t come back down to a reasonable supply/demand in the next 5-10 years to break even on the whole process.

      There’s also the fact that it wouldn’t really make sense for Valve unless they wanted to make a huge pivot in their whole business. Entry costs aside, manufacturing RAM is not really something a company can just do as a “side gig”. Valve is only like 400 people, so it wouldn’t be Valve just “starting to produce RAM” but rather Valve turning itself into a RAM manufacturer that also distributes video games.

      • Bongles@lemmy.zipEnglish
        14 minutes

        You know i always forget how small valve actually is.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.caEnglish
    4 hours

    What’s to stop them from just going a generation back and using DDR4 instead of DDR5.

    There is no one who can convince me that it makes any noticeable difference anyway. When I was putting together a new/used desktop I specifically looked for DDR4 for precisely that reason and I would take any bet that a performance hit would be measured in numbers too small for any user to even notice.

    Constantly needing newer hardware with only fractional improvements is the biggest scam in tech. They took their lesson from Apple and Samsung.

    • festus@lemmy.caEnglish
      4 hours

      I don’t think DDR4 is significantly cheaper. Plus, they would have had to go a CPU generation back too then and I think the AMD CPUs of that generation had way worse integrated graphics, so now you’d need a dedicated GPU as well.

  • Venator@lemmy.nzEnglish
    5 hours

    They should also sell it with empty ram slots…

    I’m sure a lot of people have a desktop with more ram than it needs that wouldn’t mind sacrificing a stick or two for a steam machine in thier lounge, especially of they’ve switched over from windows 10 to Linux on their desktop…

    • keyez@lemmy.worldEnglish
      5 hours

      They’ll just continue with artificial scarcity until they get sued or fined or something but won’t be enough to offset the profits

    • betanumerus@lemmy.caEnglish
      5 hours

      Their dilemma is whether to build more RAM factories, which would reduce prices, or not. Knowing when demand slows down would surely help them.

  • SleeplessCityLights@programming.devEnglish
    4 hours

    That article is confusing, are they talking about the RAM chips themselves? Or the packaging(sticks)? Or both? Also without an ad blocker on a phone, that article is herpes. Why would anyone voluntarily read an article from that site.

  • rafoix@lemmy.zipEnglish
    6 hours

    I feel like Valve would have been better off designing a new motherboard and discrete GPU design to facilitate cooling and smaller cases.

    Make a new standard and allow any third party to use it.

    They just wanted to make a new GameCube instead.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.worldEnglish
      6 hours

      Yeah, because everyone agrees the price is too low and more engineering and manufacturing costs are needed to beef it up.

      • rafoix@lemmy.zipEnglish
        5 hours

        I’m talking about something that is closer to a true PC ecosystem than the locked-in underpowered overpriced DOA system.

        If the price is going to be exorbitant the system might as well be customizable and not limited to AMD’s trash bin.

          • rafoix@lemmy.zipEnglish
            3 hours

            You’re asking me to create the design? I’m not an engineer.

            I can tell you that PCs are generally a mess and are definitely limited by standards set decades ago.

            That’s what Valve should be doing instead of making a $1000 PS4.

            • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
              2 hours

              You’re asking me to create the design? I’m not an engineer.

              yeah, so the hardware does not exist yet. but valve is not AMD either, I doubt they have the money (yes) or the expertise to effectively become a graphics card manufacturer. probably they would have to come up with their own data and power sockets, and then it wouldn’t be compatible with anything else, maybe a steam machine 2

  • hark@lemmy.worldEnglish
    11 hours

    I hope China floods the market with cheap RAM and absolutely destroys these scumbag memory companies.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      6 hours

      Like they did with EVs in the US?

      Republicans would probably make sure that can’t happen.

      • Taleya@aussie.zoneEnglish
        6 hours

        And you end up with the US getting hosed while the rest of us swim in cheap EVs.

      • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        6 hours

        The US would be the only country to suffer in this scenario. The rest of the world would be just fine with using cheaper memory while we shoot ourselves in the foot to spite them.

      • hark@lemmy.worldEnglish
        6 hours

        I’m sure they’ll try to ban Chinese memory for “national security reasons” but the differences here are that memory is much easier to smuggle in, and even if not, them flooding other markets would free up more supply of other manufacturers enough that we should see major price drops anyway. They recently tried banning imports of foreign-made routers and that didn’t seem to actually work out.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.worldEnglish
      7 hours

      It will take maybe two to three years before China could do that. The cheap Chinese RAM manufacturers are only starting their production.

      • hark@lemmy.worldEnglish
        6 hours

        That’s true, but after that point the capacity is there and it will be harder to constrain supply in this way after that. After China establishes a major memory player, I assume they wouldn’t want to fall behind after that point either.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.ukEnglish
      7 hours

      If they have the capacity to do that they would have already been doing it. Chip production is extremely expensive which is why there’s only a few companies doing it.

  • ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    10 hours

    I think legacy american market ram companies need to be blacklisted.

    Once China floods the market, we need to put these fuckers out of business.

    • Burninator05@lemmy.worldEnglish
      7 hours

      There is only one American memory company: Micron. Sk Hynix and Samsung are South Korean.

      Everyone else who sells memory modules in the west gets the actual memory chips from one of those three companies. Beyond that there is only one company that makes the waifers that the chips are made from and I think its Dutch. Definitely European.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.worldEnglish
        7 hours

        I think the wafer is dominated by the Japanese. The Dutch company you are thinking of is ASML and they manufacture 90% of the precision machines that manufacture chips in the world.

  • kescusay@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1 day

    It’s related to the AI bubble. The AI companies are trying to make it as difficult as possible to get a good PC, because they know they’re cooked if the general public has access to systems that can run AI models locally, so they’re buying everything up as fast as they can in the name of data centers that will never be built.

    As soon as the first one fails, it’s all over. Prices will tumble and memory makers will come crawling back to Valve (and other hardware makers) begging them to buy.

    • shads@lemy.lolEnglish
      59 minutes

      Once the US economy craters into the recession it should by all rights currently be working through… Oh I am sure at that point there will be all sorts of companies dumping all sorts of things into every market they can to try to survive.

      The AI bubble bursting will fuck the world in ways that will take decades to unfuck. If sanity was even slightly fashionable right now governments around the world, especially the US would be using every power they had to put some limits on this whole mess. Regulation, taxation, environmental controls everything would be on the table.

      Instead we seem to be racing at the wall as fast as we can with NVidia and co in the driving seat, and governments around the world in the passenger seat screaming “Go! Go! Go!”

      That’s OK though, economic turmoil is felt by the individual based on their starting wealth. The rich often manage to become wealthier, it’s the poor who get buried. Yay capitalism.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      24 hours

      Let’s not forget that almost all memory is made by a cartel of 3 companies known for price fixing. They’re all being as slow as possible about increasing production capacity.

      • Zoot@reddthat.comEnglish
        24 hours

        Is that not for good reason though? Only for them really, but if they did ramp up production and then the bubble pops… I wish they would ramp up production, it’s just easy to understand why they won’t.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.worldEnglish
          20 hours

          If there is a demand for ram, which there is in the consumer market, then it shouldn’t be a risk. If DCs get cancelled, then they should have contracts in place for at least a minimum buy, which should offset cost risk. If they don’t have that, then that’s just shitty business. Even still, they can just as easily slow down production if needed. If the bubble pops, either they’ll have inventory that the world will buy and they can throttle back prod, or they don’t have inventory and they will have to throttle prod anyway since demand for DCs as a whole has to be more than just the consumer market.

          Idk, it’s probably just the cynic in me, but I think it’s likely this is just manipulation of the prices, especially given the history of these companies doing just that.

          • Johanno@feddit.orgEnglish
            9 hours

            They definitely have contracts that ensure the ai companies buy the ordered amount.

            However building new production factories is expensive as fuck. They know they need to do that. But why buy a factory for billions and sell RAM at a lower price when you just don’t spend billions and earn even more with less RAM

            • Damage@feddit.itEnglish
              8 hours

              Because if you don’t do everything possible to continuously improve your business, others may catch up with you

              • Johanno@feddit.orgEnglish
                8 hours

                Hah. That’s the point where a good cartel comes in and ensures that this is not the case.

    • Mac@mander.xyzEnglish
      22 hours

      Yep. Just like how nobody uses Windows since Linux is easily accessible.

      Wait

      • dragonlover@lemmy.zipEnglish
        11 hours

        It’s not the average consumer spending thousands on tokens. Even my work just had a meeting about how “the free lunch is over” now that AI costs are expanding, and they bought their own hardware to investigate hosting local models.

        Linux is widely used in the enterprise world. It’s the home consumer world that doesn’t use it as much and even that is rapidly changing as things enshitify.

        • Mac@mander.xyzEnglish
          19 hours

          The general public adopting open tech themselves instead of using corporate options

          Was that not clear?

      • Otter@lemmy.caEnglish
        20 hours

        Having an option vs not having an option

        Also Linux and Windows are pretty different in use cases and capabilities. Meanwhile, local AI models have a very similar user experience. If hardware was cheaper and people could run better LLMs locally, they wouldn’t pay monthly for it.

        • Mac@mander.xyzEnglish
          18 hours

          You’re right, the general public doesn’t use Linux due to the lack of ability to browse the web and file their taxes—Windows exclusive functionality.

          • Otter@lemmy.caEnglish
            18 hours

            In the workplace, there are still a lot of domain specific programs that don’t have Linux support. Companies don’t have much of an incentive to port that stuff over. As for the people who just need a web browser, they probably would use Linux just fine if they could buy a computer at BestBuy that comes with Linux preinstalled

            Compare that to LLM programs, where it’s a matter of “download this app instead of that one, because this one is free and that one costs $25 a month”

  • brachiosaurus@mander.xyzEnglish
    7 hours

    If you disagree on valve share in publishing a game on steam it would pretty much be the same story. Valve is a for profit corporation whos ceo own an entire fleet of mega yachts, they are just as shit as any other corporation.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.ukEnglish
      7 hours

      I can always just not publish on Steam. There are other options.

      What’s happening here with RAM is a cartel

      • mushroommunk@lemmy.todayEnglish
        6 hours

        I seriously don’t get this constant “Valve is a monopoly, end them” bull crap. Yes they’re a business. Yes they make money. Sure they’ve got flaws we should tackle. But they aren’t out there trying to shut itch.io down or using legislation to stop you from hosting the game yourself. GOG and Epic aren’t as popular because they don’t provide a strong enough product to pull people away.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1 day

    So maybe try to remember that after the AI bubble burst, and there is more RAM than customers, and it’s the customer that sets the price.

    • SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org
      23 hours

      I’m starting to think more and more that the only way to pop the bubble is the Luigi Style.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldEnglish
        13 hours

        Knowing Sam Altman, he might have a plateu of plans to keep the bubble from bursting. Him going will mean the bubble will have one week at top.

  • rafoix@lemmy.zipEnglish
    9 hours

    It’s hard to believe that it’s just a RAM issue.

    Valve is going full Apple with the SSD upgrade. They’re making a healthy profit from each system they sell.

      • rafoix@lemmy.zipEnglish
        6 hours

        Did you for get that when they upgrade the storage to 2TB they do not also include the 512GB storage included in the low end model?

        • DillDough@lemmy.zipEnglish
          6 hours

          Could be said for literally every single product ever made, come back to reality, holy fucking shit dude.

          • rafoix@lemmy.zipEnglish
            5 hours

            Valve is making a bad deal worse. By being needlessly greedy.

            I am in the reality where all the other gaming consoles massively outperform it while costing hundreds less and also providing a controller.

            • Croquette@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
              3 hours

              Do you have any experience in product development? They went through a design process and unfortunately for them, when came time to choose a storage and RAM solution, they had to do it through the current price crisis.

              So they either had to table the design and lose their development money or go through with it with the current storage and RAM cost.

              • rafoix@lemmy.zipEnglish
                2 hours

                Does it matter if I have experience in product development? Do you?

                A product has to justify its cost. This one does not.

                You can DIY or buy a pre-built that massively outperforms Valve’s console.

                • Croquette@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
                  49 minutes

                  Yes I do have experience, in fact it’s core to my job.

                  The cost to design is significant and wasting a few years of development is not a light decision. So Valve either had to scrap the design and waste the development cost, or price it according to the current PC parts prices

                  You are right that people can DIY, but it always was an option and people still buy ready-made computers, so that’s a moot point.

                  The price for comparable parts and same form factor isn’t far off from DIY.

    • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.worldEnglish
      7 hours

      Why shouldn’t they? Margins are going to be tight btw, so they’re really not. What they’re really selling is a vehicle for Steam.

      BTW, try putting together a same or better spec build yourself and get back to us with the cost.

      • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
        English
        5 hours

        They’re also trying to make Steam OS available to install on any PC, so any argument of “AlL tHeY tHiNk AbOuT iS pRoFiTs” goes out the door there. I think the only struggle right now is getting it to work with NVidia graphics cards or something.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
          6 hours

          For like $50-$100 cheaper. And they all ignored the small form factor which could easily cost that.

        • rafoix@lemmy.zipEnglish
          6 hours

          You can build and buy a pre-built PC that easily outperforms the Steam console.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            4 hours

            that does not make sense. you are not building a pre-built, because then its not a pre-built. is the sky cloudy over there?

            • rafoix@lemmy.zipEnglish
              3 hours

              I meant that pre-built or DIY are both better deals. I realize now that I should have been more clear.

              This Steam console is bad when discussing performance and value. It has a nice design.

      • brachiosaurus@mander.xyzEnglish
        7 hours

        Why shouldn’t they?

        Because they are a for profit company with a billionaire ceo. Making profits it’s their job.

        BTW, try putting together a same or better spec build yourself and get back to us with the cost.

        The price you pay for something in a store is not the same price valve pays for a stock of parts. They buy the same stuff for a lot cheaper and resell it at an higher price to make profits.