It feels like this is very intense here compared to other social media services/protocols.
Why is that?
It’s everywhere. They brought it from their previous home.
But, one aspect…
Mods banning anyone who does not chirp their party line [and deletes any posts/comments offering different perspectives], creates echo chambers and confirmation biases that recursively self re-affirm, drilling deeper into groupthink, mass formation, and totalitarianised psyche.
It didn’t start here. And it won’t end here.
People who only see one aspect of someone’s identity often think everyone with that identity is the same.
It’s a cognitive bias. I assure you. I converse with people on here all the time with different opinions even though we might both mostly share the same ball-park ideology.
Ask me how I know you’ve never seen an argument about Russia.
Could just be a consequence of a less ideologically diverse user base to start with.
I’m so upset about (privacy, reddit, corporatism, etc, etc) that I’m prepared to leave my large online social networks for a smaller space on principal is probably a bit of an outlier position to take.
Not that it’s wrong, but it’s probably something we all agree on. Something out there is so fucked up we refuse to be a part of it on principal, even if we don’t fully agree on what that is.
Pretty much this. We have strong beliefs. Strong enough to leave a popular, functional platform for ideological reasons.
I left for user interface reasons, actually. That’s why I’m still on lemmy and not piefed.
I left because all of my accounts were banned for criticizing the government 🤷. I like it here more though. Smaller community makes it easier to be part of the conversation.
You walk into a place with a big sign that says nude strip club. When you go in if you see nude people you can’t be outraged. You knew exactly what type of place you were walking into.
Lemmy like most all social media is overwhelmingly used by YOUNG people. A majority of young people think a like. Nothing new there.
If you go to a social media platform and are annoyed at the opinions of young people, then leave.
Because you wrote this I too agree in heard mentality.
Actually let’s agree to disagree. Lemmy is a niche social media platform. By its very nature attracts a particular set of people. Those who like to self host those who care about privacy. A lot of college educated people. So it’s not insane to reason many of these people will have similar beliefs or political leanings.
This is further reinforced with what Lemmy is all about, topics for like minded people.
Does that capture everyone ? No ! Of course not. You still will find people who disagree all over the fediverse.
Humans by modern nature do their best to put themselves in a box. Don’t know why …
“When is the last time you hit your wife?” ass question
It’s not that. What you’re presenting rhetorically as fact is actually just your biased opinion. Does that answer your question?
While we are gaining people who’re seeking refugee from the claustrophobic-like suffocation that is the surface web of social media. We’re taking some on the chin with knowing that some of those ‘refugees’ are assholes who probably have been a prick elsewhere. They just don’t care about owning to the problem.
I’m not sure I understand the question. Could you provide an example of the herd mentality?

Marriage is only for women, everyone knows that.
We are united by a common enemy (reddit)
The reason here seems to be that the left-right axis is a good-evil axis, so they’re trying to find the furthest left position on the spectrum they can occupy. As a result, everyone has the exact same beliefs and holds them with a smug sense of either moral or intellectual superiority.
It isn’t so much herd mentality as it is they’ve given themselves very little ideological wiggle-room to work with as a community.
Just on Lemmy? People just ride the waves in general, women more than men but still. Nothing new or even unnatural. And every so often the sheep will have a good shepherd.
Why women more than men? Elaborate I’m curious.
Idk why, probably emotional reasons stemming from their biology, it’s just what I’ve seen. They are afraid of being alone in their convictions even if they’re right so they let them go, or they’re not brave enough to analyse something in earnest in case the result doesn’t please them, or they simply don’t care about all this nonsense and just wanna have a good time so intellectual exploration is disregarded. And so they’ll just ride the wave, since “everyone else” is in it so it must be safe, it must be right, right? And sometimes they’re right but if you’re a postmodern, nihilistic, amoral Westerner, for example, that wave will kill you.
Yeah this is a ridiculous take. You are just describing how different people operate in a society and then ascribing gender to it. Your anecdotal experience is not representative of reality at large.
What is representative then? Do you have some studies to share that contradict my lived experience? I’ve lived in three different countries, two different continents, for over 30 years, and that’s what reality has shown me. Of course, exceptions to generalisations always exist (Francesca Albanese and Greta, for example), but the norm remains. Bear in mind I’m not criticising women. If anything, I’m absolving them of criticism.
Your lived experience doesn’t amount for shit you are just a bitter 40-50 something year old misogynist.
That’s completely inaccurate.
Which part? Because you are saying things that bitter old misogynists would say.










